What Makes AI Different to Audit
Probabilistic outputs, drift and agents.
The question: Why do audit techniques built for deterministic systems fall short?
You keep: AI system profile
Test an AI system, produce evidence that stands up to scrutiny, and report it to a board. For the people who have to answer how a model decided.
Who it is for
Internal auditors, model risk managers, assurance teams at audit firms, and compliance leads.
The problem
Audit methods for AI are still unsettled. The hardest question is also the most common: when an auditor asks how a model decided, can you produce a clean answer from evidence?
You leave with an audit work programme and an evidence pack.
Outcomes
Outline
Every module answers one question, then you apply it in a timed exercise on a fictional case and complete the artefact before you move on.
Probabilistic outputs, drift and agents.
The question: Why do audit techniques built for deterministic systems fall short?
You keep: AI system profile
Inventory, tiers and control objectives.
The question: How do you decide what to audit first?
You keep: AI inventory with tiering
Accuracy, bias, robustness and hallucination.
The question: How do you test something that gives different answers each time?
You keep: Test design sheet
Permissions, tool use and traceability.
The question: When software acts, what do you audit?
You keep: Agent audit checklist
Reconstruct inputs, controls and approvals.
The question: What do you hand an auditor, a regulator or a court?
You keep: Evidence pack index
Findings that lead to action.
The question: How do you write findings that a board can act on?
You keep: Finding and board summary
An audit work programme and evidence pack for a live AI use case.
What you produce
A repeatable method for the next AI audit.
Capstone: An audit work programme and evidence pack for a live AI use case.